The world Health Organization

WHO, The World Health Organization, which it evokes for you? Doctors who care about your health, people open, tolerant and humanist? Let us look in greater detail what the WHO is easy simply go to their website and read the documents they publish.

"Over the last 10 to 15 years, we found that young people have become a prime target for actions to promote alcoholic beverages. When resources are allocated to specific campaigns to influence young people's behavior, it becomes increasingly difficult to encourage a balanced and healthy alcohol, "said Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, Director-General of WHO, in his opening address. "Accordingly, I ask that we charge of international experts to examine together the question of the promotion of alcohol among young people. ""

The Health Report in Europe 2005 "Alcohol The most effective way to solve the problems associated with alcohol in the population is to implement policies that aim at the diversified increase in the price of alcohol, reducing the availability of alcoholic beverages and implementation of measures fighting drunk driving and consumption of alcohol under the legal age. Liquor Prices Numerous scientific evidence demonstrates that increasing the price of alcoholic beverages reduces consumption and limit the problems. In most countries, especially those practicing a lighter tax on alcohol, increasing the tax has helped not only to increase revenues, but also to reduce public spending related to the adverse effects of alcoholism. " This means that countries that have a wine culture, such as France, will save more time to carry out the orders of WHO. But there are more modern country (without wine culture) that run faster orders. In Finland, for example, executes orders very well. Alcohol is unaffordable. Norway (without wine culture), it also performs very well orders: tobacco and alcohol are unaffordable. It is no coincidence, Gro Harlem Brundtland, former Prime Minister of Norway was director general of WHO from 1998 to 2003. She lived for over 20 years in the United States and has been doing his studies there (Master in Public Health). [...] Drinking and driving Most of the measures taken to combat drunk driving, such as establishing checkpoints anti-drunkenness, random breath testing, by lowering the limit of alcohol in the blood, suspension of driving licences , the establishment of the provisional licence or progressive for new drivers, as well as brief interventions for the dangerous drivers are also particularly effective. Their implementation and management can also be performed in most countries at a modest cost. " These policy choices, WHO we impose, with the blessing of political and justification of "scientific" studies of WHO. WHO is developing measures to reduce alcohol-related harm 2006 "The high consumption of alcohol is associated with more than 60 diseases and other health conditions, including mental illness and suicide, several types of cancer and other non-communicable diseases such as liver cirrhosis, as well as intentional and unintentional injuries. Recent studies to suggest that there is a link between disorders caused by alcohol and HIV / AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, alcohol abuse resulting in high-risk behaviour. Alcohol abuse leads to a high degree of disease when combined with other addictions, such as nicotine addiction. Alcohol abuse has negative effects specific to women, such as unwanted pregnancies, some problems for the fetus and an increased risk of breast cancer. Among the negative social consequences of excessive drinking, are aggressive behaviour and disorders of family life. Alcohol is a significant cause of decline and even loss of productivity. "

Telephone portable II: Establish a dialogue on the risks associated with electromagnetic fields 2004 "With regard to RF fields, to date, the balance sheet data suggests that exposure to RF fields low (such as those emitted by mobile phones and their base stations) does not cause adverse health effects . Some scientists have reported minor effects of the use of mobile phones, including changes in brain activity, reaction times and routes of sleep. Insofar as these effects were confirmed, they appear to be within the normal limits of the observed variation in humans. The particular sources of EMF as the high-voltage lines and base stations for mobile telephony often generate great anxiety among the population. This anxiety can lead people to strongly oppose the establishment of such facilities. Where the opposition of the community rises, it is often because the communication has not established early enough to ensure the understanding and trust of the public. Good communication on a project requires planning and know-how. It is important to anticipate the needs of information: what to share and when to share it. More information is introduced quickly nuanced, more makers will be able to avoid the problem reaches the crisis stage. It is indeed much easier to help people shape their opinions to make the change. Because the topics that may be controversial becoming even more critical at election time or at other political events, it is advisable to prepare strategies and Keep opportunities to act. " Here the tone changes, the doctor, or rather the scientist, invites the political dialogue and getting people to understand that there is no risk and gives valuable advice in the handling of public opinion.

Obesity is among the most serious public health problems of the twenty-first century. Its prevalence has tripled in many countries of the WHO European Region for 80 years and the number of people affected continues to grow worrying, especially among children. Obesity is already responsible for 2 to 8% of health spending and 10 to 13% of deaths in different parts of the Region. Companies and governments must act to stem this epidemic. National policies should encourage and facilitate greater physical activity and improve the availability and accessibility of healthy food. They should also encourage the participation of different sectors of government, civil society, private sector and other stakeholders. " Here we come back to the epidemic for which there is an urgent need for action to protect children. The catastrophe is imminent, so we will be able to issue decrees and drastically restrict individual freedoms. Standards WHO Child Growth 2006 "What advantage of new standards WHO child growth compared to the current growth sheets? The new standards are distinguished by several innovative elements. They show how children should grow; approach is prescriptive, not merely descriptive. These files show that in the main regions of the world, all children can have a height, weight and a normal development and comparable if they are properly fed, receive appropriate health care and grow up in an environment conducive to health. " We hens in battery cages ...

Nuclear accident in Japan: people visiting the country do not have to worry "The population now runs no risk of exposure to radiation in the vicinity of the production of nuclear fuel at Tokai-mura (Japan), after the accident that occurred recently. Therefore, it 'therefore no risk, and there has never been, for people who visit Japan and do not in the immediate vicinity of the plant, the WHO announced today. The fission of uranium 235 stopped and the emergency situation is now under control in the factory, according to the latest information from the Agency International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) about the accident September 30, 1999. The emission of radiation have stopped completely and there was no release of radioactive material for several days. " There was more urgency, no chronic disease or pandemic, everything is fine. The scientists are well aware that radiation atomatiques are infinitely less dangerous than cigarette smoke. It is not exactly the view of Professor Michel Fernex on another case, that of Chernobyl. Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Medicine at the University of Basel Former member of the Steering Committees for the Malaria and Filarioses, (TDR) Tropical Diseases Research

"Some twenty doctors, pharmacists and nurses of all nationalities have just launched an appeal to the World Health Organization (WHO) will break all ties with the International Agency for Atomic Energy (IAEA). They accuse l 'Organisation not to be free to tell the truth about the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. Much of this petition, Professor Michel Fernex, president of the association "Children of Chernobyl", says that acts of the conference held in Geneva in 1995 have never been made public. number of associations deplore the "guilty silence" of the WHO on the nuclear disaster occurred in 1986. "We want WHO to be allowed to explore and deepen problems associated with ionizing radiation, "explains Michel Fernex."

V Tobacco: Impact of mental and behavioural disorders 2001 "It has long been thought that the depressed subjects tended to smoke more because of their symptoms, but new evidence to suggest an inverse relationship. A study among adolescents has shown that depression occurs more often in those who already smoke , which seems to prove that smoking is in fact the cause of depression in this age group. " Recommendations on the treatment of tobacco dependence based on scientific evidence June 2001 "The tobacco dependence is recognized as a disease, both in the International Classification of Diseases of the World Health Organization (ICD-10) in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV)." "The tobacco dependence is a chronic recurring and even in the general population of smokers trying to stop the rate of relapse is high." "At the moment, the main treatment of tobacco dependence are nicotine replacement and bupropion. There are six different nicotine replacement therapies, the patch (timbre), gum, nasal spray (nebulizer), inhaleur, sublingual tablet and lozenge (pellet). Smokers smoking 10 cigarettes a day or more, wishing to stop smoking should be encouraged to use nicotine replacement or bupropion for cessation aid. " You are victims of a chronic disease ( "the call" scientifques the ICD-10) and it will heal. From willingly or by force, you eat nicotine substitutes, which do little better than a placebo. Understood? The WHO recommendations for the European strategy for tobacco control 2005 "In order to protect public health goals, propose to limit the number of cigarettes to 200 cigarettes per person in an import for personal use from another country, and even within countries the European Union. " Thanks to WHO that you can buy a cartridge in "duty-free". Framework Convention of Tobacco Control 2005 "- Develop counter-advertising. -- Amend regular warnings and pictograms to generate a public debate. -- Add warnings in all places smoky (with positive messages of tips for smoking cessation). -- Combine messages warning and an offer of aid to smoking cessation. -- Form a smoking cessation advisor in each school and provide written recommendations for aid to stopping smoking. -- The warning against smoking and cessation assistance must precede the creation of an environment banning tobacco smoke. -- Even though smokers are goodwill, experience shows that the only option for a healthy environment is a law prohibiting smoking in all public places. -- The law should make clear control mechanisms clear and specific sanctions. -- Experience shows that the only option for a healthy environment is the strict prohibition by law on smoking in all public places. "

Geneva August 2006 "Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor of New York city, has announced a pledge of US $ 125 million for uneinitiative aimed at ending the global epidemic of tabagisme.L 'World Health Organization is pleased to be part descinq main partners of this initiative and looks forward to laperspective to work within this framework. " Outbreak: Sudden and rapid propagation of an infectious disease, infection, a large number of people from one region. Spaces 100% free of smoke: the only solution 2007 "Smoke-free environments are good for business, since families with children, many non-smokers, and even smokers often prefer to go to places free of smoke." This is information that should be of interest to the scene of conviviality. "Smoke-free environments are good for business." You will not know it? Indeed, when there will be no smoking on earth, your turnover will go up. You will not know it? "Expert" why? In sociology, psychology, enthropologie, technology, destruction? [...] "The costs are minimal and they work!" A decree tops, and the costs are minimal and it is effective. What casually in déstruction. The next step will permit smoking, as is planned in England. VI Employment at WHO: "How WHO will it be determined whether a person who is doing a candidate for the post of WHO smoking or consuming tobacco? Candidates must answer the following questions: • "Do you smoke or consume you of tobacco products? " • "If you currently smoke or consume tobacco products, will you continue to do so if you are employed by the WHO? " If the answer to both questions is "yes", the nomination of the candidate will not be taken into consideration. -- You now know a little better what the WHO. Conclusion: The WHO is concerned relatively few issues of asbestos, pesticides, waste-radioactive, its method of financing, is undoubtedly the cause. Time will lack for collecting documents on the subject. It focuses primarily on matters of individual conduct "supposed" risk. The speech of the WHO is to say that The Tobacco alccol, drugs, obesity, sexual deviants are expensive to public health. The goal of scientists from WHO, is not to save the community money, but that people die the oldest possible laudable goal, except that it does not have the money to the community but for the pharmaceutical industry and medical care, because what costs the most expensive in terms of health is the end of life, after 75 years. A five year old child could understand this. As mentioned in another article, a smoker, for example, costs 200000 euro less to the community than someone who does not smoke and is not obese, in part because the smoker is taxed and Above all, as he dies early, it costs less in retirement and health care (see our article "The smoking costs Does dear to the community", broadcast in part on Rue89). But the policies are not scientists, if they are presented with a table full of numbers, they say, after consultation with their expert, in general WHO: Okay, if in addition it allows for "fliquer people" and that " n'embête not on the real polluters, why not. So WHO decides for you: tobacco, alcohol and drugs all of this is very bad: prohibited. The method is fully developed: First, it frightens about the risks for young people, because it is sure to reach parents who are concerned about, legitimately, for their children. It triggers in the population phenomena of fear and rejection. Experts from the WHO post studies on these subjects to prove the truth of the matter. Studies who, in addition to being oriented, are based on statistical projections in the United States, a country which was quite the same eating habits as us. Studies that do, in any case, account other factors: history, sociology, psychology, environmental fragility, freedom, economy, etc.. For example, passive smoking is 6000 dead! Advertising campaigns are conducted to explain the dangers of smoking, passive smoking, alcohol, drinking and driving, drug. The population is said: "Yes, but all these products are very bad, we must combat them. Tobacco smoke is very dangerous. Alcohol is dangerous. The drug is dangerous. " Television adds a layer, in addition to advertising propaganda, which are already mounting pressure. The radio and newspapers followed suit and make the copy and paste on the alarming reports WHO experts. It puts some decrees, without seeking to vote or discussion of Deputies. Then we prohibits advertising of products, increases prices, it makes it difficult consumption (permit, age, licensing, price, fines), then consumption is prohibited. Where the WHO is an expert in manipulation, is that for the first 16-18 years, the population of children who accepts it, because it is their role to protect their children. Then, one can only go to the adult, thanks to the fear that has been installed. The adult is transformed into child culpabilisé for his happiness. It is contemplated at any time, an adult know that alcohol, tobacco and drugs have an impact on their health and that it is up to him to choose. No, the three products are very bad, they must be fought and banned as a matter of urgency, but gradually. Consumption is not decreasing necessarily, it would tend to increase. Above all, the consumption of the product, alcohol, for example, becomes anxiety, instead of being normal, because it was prohibited. This allows to set up a vicious circle: alcoholism does not always decline, measures must be taken even more restrictive. The changeover of products outside the law, to justify gradually a police state, for the happiness and health of all. " A state policeman who makes automatic radar everywhere, checks blood alcohol. A police state that will transform smokers, drinkers and drug addicts into criminals. This is the case today, smoking marijuana (more than six million in France) and it is now the case of smokers, which saw the police go into bars, to check if everyone respects the new decree WHO. This will happen then drinkers, which must in the first instance drink only four glasses and no more, as advocated by the WHO currently, and so on ... In fact, the population has the right to take only drug that sells pharmaceutical and that's all. Regardless of whether people are dying of cancer to asbestos. They do not know and believe that they are too smoky. Experts from WHO are there to prove it. And studies on new pollution, created by the industry, with very limited funding. Moreover, the population of gavée entertainment programme, it is no longer able to see that he gives no information on the reality that surrounds it. The result is: a good portion of pubs and restaurants draw the curtain. Places of friendliness without tobacco and alcohol-free, quick as the Mac Do. This avoids exchanges and better control the population. Internet locked for the safety of relatives or, less visible, the search engines do not show that some sites. Headline in newspapers: "When contacted by the Internet, she was raped and murdered." People tap it to denounce anyone who drinks, smokes or uses drugs and is therefore a dangerous criminal. Violence continues to rise, as is the case for more than 30 years. This allows to add more police, since it leads to violence and more laws freedom. In the background, the wicked terrorists to justify traffic control and communications of people. And the worst is that the WHO is implanted in 193 countries. Fortunately some countries badly obey the orders of WHO and some leave even the new director of consciences. WHO is The World Dictatorship of the industry: Thanks to the pseudo "science" in the service of industry. The man is a chicken battery, which must be profitable and productive: Do not die too quickly and meet the standards of WHO: Alcohol, tobacco, drugs, obesity, sexuality, and so on. It might be time to act? Unless a majority of the French would like to live in the ideal world of WHO and the industrial partners? What do you think? In a democratic dictatorship, voters can still vote? Hoping that the voting machines work properly?